Jamal Haynes

Jamal Haynes

RBΒ·Georgia Tech
RS SeniorΒ·5'9"Β·190 lbs

Consensus

Derived from 2 independent scout reports + combine measurables.

71.5
Composite Score
Pick 100-175
Projected Pick
72.0
Film
+0.0
Combine
-0.5
Age

Scout Reports

Scout 1Primary Analysis62 / 100

Scouting Report: Jamal Haynes β€” RB | Georgia Tech | 2026 NFL Draft

DynastySignal | Film Review β€” Sick EditzHD Highlights Package (highlights_2_ series, 18 frames)




The Short Version


Jamal Haynes is a compact, lightning-quick speed back who is at his absolute best in open space β€” the kind of player who makes crowd gasps happen when he gets into the second level. His receiving ability out of the backfield adds a genuine second dimension that will generate NFL interest beyond pure rushing value. The case against: he's undersized for the position by NFL standards, he'll be a liability in pass protection until proven otherwise, and the ACC isn't exactly the proving ground for physical dominance. The ceiling is a dynamic satellite back in the right spread system; the floor is a practice squad speedster who can't stay on the field on third downs.




Measurables & Background


| Attribute | Detail |

|------------------|---------------------------------------|

| Full Name | Jamal Alexander Haynes |

| Position | RB |

| School | Georgia Tech (ACC) |

| Class | Senior (Redshirt Junior through 2024) |

| Height | 5'9" |

| Weight | ~175–190 lbs (listed variously) |

| Age (2026 Draft) | 23 (born October 5, 2002) |

| Hometown | Loganville, GA |

| High School | Grayson High School |

| Recruit Rating | 3-star |


Career Notable:

  • 2024: 944 rushing yards, 9 rushing TDs, 169 carries (5.6 avg); 28 receptions, 166 yards, 3 receiving TDs β€” 1,110 total yards, 12 total TDs; All-ACC Honorable Mention (second consecutive year)
  • First Georgia Tech RB to rush for 900+ yards in back-to-back seasons since Jonathan Dwyer (2008–09)
  • 7 career 100-yard rushing games β€” tied 13th in program history



  • Film Sources Reviewed


    | Source | Frames | Notes |

    |--------|--------|-------|

    | ACC Digital Network β€” Haynes King 2025 Highlights (prefix: highlights_) | 18 frames | DISQUALIFIED β€” wrong subject. Frames show Haynes King (GT QB) taking snaps and throwing passes. NOT used in this report. |

    | Sick EditzHD β€” Jamal Haynes, Shiftiest RB in College Football (prefix: highlights_2_) | 18 frames | βœ… PRIMARY SOURCE β€” used exclusively. Confirmed Jamal Haynes #11 in GT white/gold, identified across multiple opponents (FSU, UNC, Maryland, Georgia, Kentucky, Miami, bowl game). |

    | 680 The Fan β€” Is Haynes King Georgia Tech's Version of Cam Newton? (prefix: highlights_3_) | 19 frames | DISQUALIFIED β€” wrong subject. Haynes King QB content. NOT used in this report. |


    All analysis and frame citations below reference highlights_2_ only.




    What The Film Shows


    1. Vision & Patience β€” Grade: B (6.5/10 NFL scale)


    Haynes is not a slasher who predetermines his cut before he gets the handoff. He shows genuine patience to let blocks develop. In highlights_2_004 (vs. Kentucky, aerial shot at the 40-yard line), he holds his lane and waits for the block to seal before exploding through the crease β€” his cut is sharp and decisive rather than tentative. In highlights_2_002 (vs. FSU near the sideline), he threads through a narrow window between defenders rather than bouncing outside immediately, which shows trust in his blocking and an understanding of where the yards are. In highlights_2_011 (vs. Maryland, aerial view), you can see him reading the second level as he clears the line of scrimmage, adjusting his angle subtly to maximize space.


    The concern here is he's not a player who creates yards where none exist. His runs tend to work when there's a designed lane β€” he finds it quickly and accelerates, but when the scheme breaks down, he doesn't have the size to bully his way to positive yards. He's dependent on blocking in a way that the elite vision guys aren't.


    2. Explosiveness & Speed β€” Grade: Aβˆ’ (9.0/10 NFL scale)


    This is the trait that gets him drafted. It's a legitimate, NFL-caliber weapon.


    In highlights_2_003, a wide aerial shot shows Haynes completely alone inside the 10-yard line while all defenders are still at midfield or beyond. This isn't a blown coverage situation where one guy missed β€” he's outrun an entire defense sideline-to-sideline on what appears to be a sweep or counter. That kind of separation doesn't happen in college unless the player is genuinely fast.


    In highlights_2_014 (vs. FSU, aerial), he's again alone in the open field near the sideline β€” defenders trailing hopelessly behind. In highlights_2_005 (vs. UNC, aerial), he turns the corner past two defenders who have the angle and simply outruns them. In highlights_2_008 (open-field one-on-one), he juke-steps a defender so violently that the defender is off his feet before Haynes is past him β€” a combination of lateral quickness AND burst off the cut that is legitimately special. The acceleration through cuts, not just straight-line speed, is what stands out. He's not a track guy who only goes fast in a straight line.


    3. Contact Balance & Power β€” Grade: Bβˆ’ (6.0/10 NFL scale)


    He's not a power back and nobody should pretend otherwise. But for his size, he shows solid contact balance and functional leg drive that keeps him from being a "fall-at-first-contact" back.


    In highlights_2_013 (close-up vs. FSU, near goal line), Haynes shows excellent pad level β€” he's low through the contact, driving his legs, getting at least a yard or two past where a less disciplined back would go down. In highlights_2_015 (aerial, FSU β€” what appears to be the Dublin, Ireland opener), he goes over the pile for a touchdown rather than through it, showing athletic instincts to use his body advantageously. In highlights_2_016 (bowl game), a defender gets a high arm tackle on him and Haynes stays upright and keeps churning β€” decent contact balance for a smaller back.


    The limitation is clear in highlights_2_006 (vs. Miami, aerial) and highlights_2_010 (goal-line pile): once multiple defenders arrive, he goes down. He's not going to drag anyone for extra yards in a phone-booth situation. The goal-line production in his stats (nine rushing TDs in 2024) owes something to his elusiveness getting him to the line rather than pure goal-line power.


    4. Receiving Ability β€” Grade: B+ (7.5/10 NFL scale)


    This is the second reason he gets drafted and the trait that carries the most dynasty upside.


    The bio confirmed 28 catches for 166 yards and 3 TDs out of the backfield in 2024 alone β€” that's not token usage, that's a designed role. Highlights_2_009 (bowl game end zone, aerial) shows what appears to be a TD catch β€” he's secured the ball in the end zone coming out of his break. In highlights_2_018 (near the 10-yard line vs. FSU), he's releasing out of the backfield on a route, showing natural separation and body control in space. In highlights_2_008, he carries the ball as a receiver in space and shows the same cuts that make him dangerous as a rusher.


    The highlight reel doesn't include many catch-at-the-line situations to evaluate hand technique under duress, which is a gap in the sample. But his usage numbers in 2024 are the validation. For dynasty purposes, a back who contributes in the passing game doesn't fall off the map during injury weeks the same way a pure runner does. This trait matters.


    5. Pass Protection β€” Grade: C (5.0/10 NFL scale)


    Nothing in the highlights film addresses this β€” as expected from a hype reel. Given his size (5'9", ~175–190 lbs), this will be the biggest obstacle to staying on the field at the NFL level. He does not have the frame to absorb NFL edge rushers or linebackers in blitz pickup. This is a legitimate concern that could cap his early-career role to obvious run/pass situation groupings.


    No frames from highlights_2_ showed any pass pro reps. Grade is based on size/profile projection, not film evidence. NFL teams will need to evaluate this specifically before investing draft capital.


    6. Scheme Fit β€” Grade: B+ (7.5/10 NFL scale)


    Haynes is tailor-made for a modern spread, RPO-heavy offense that uses backs as receivers and weapons in space. Think 49ers-style outside zone, or a Chiefs/Eagles-type system where the back serves as a primary release valve in the passing game while threatening big plays on designed runs into space. The worst fit would be a traditional power-run offense that asks him to pick up blitzes and pound between the tackles on early downs.


    Highlights_2_003, 005, and 014 all show him at his best: space, speed, and angles. Highlights_2_008 shows the open-field elusiveness that an NFL OC can design around. The GT offense gave him the right diet β€” outside runs, screens, receiving routes β€” and he thrived. That scheme familiarity is a good sign for NFL transition.




    Strengths Summary


  • Elite open-field speed, legitimate separation tool. In highlights_2_003, Haynes outran an entire defense and was alone in the end zone while defenders were still 10+ yards back. This level of gap-to-separation is rare and translates. Backed by highlights_2_014 (again alone in open field vs. FSU) and highlights_2_005 (turns the corner on two defenders with the angle).

  • Lateral quickness that complements top-end speed. He's not just fast in a straight line. Highlights_2_008 shows a violent juke that leaves a defender off-balance and in the dirt before Haynes is clear. Highlights_2_004 shows a hard lateral cut through a crease with instant acceleration out of the break.

  • Legitimate receiving profile β€” not just a gadget player. 28 catches, 166 yards, 3 TDs in 2024 confirms the passing-game role. Highlights_2_009 (TD reception in end zone) and highlights_2_018 (route running in flat vs. FSU) back it up on film. For dynasty, this is critical β€” it raises his weekly floor considerably.

  • Good patience and vision for a speed back. Highlights_2_004 (waiting for the Kentucky block to develop) and highlights_2_011 (reading the Maryland second level pre-cut) show he's not just running fast β€” he's running smart. Vision and speed combined is a real trait stack.

  • Functional contact balance for his size. Highlights_2_013 (low pad level through contact at FSU goal line), highlights_2_015 (athletic leap over the pile for TD), and highlights_2_016 (fights through arm tackle in bowl game) all show that he doesn't evaporate on first contact. He's going to fall eventually, but he makes guys miss or extends plays.

  • Motor. Highlights_2_001 and highlights_2_007 show a player who competes with energy. Highlights_2_013 (driving through a pile near the goal line vs. FSU) shows competitive toughness.



  • Concerns & Risks


  • Size is a real limitation, not just a talking point. At 5'9" and ~175–190 lbs, he's at the small end of viable NFL backs. He cannot overcome broken schemes with physicality, and he will be a credibility risk in 8-man boxes. NFL defenses will know he's not a threat between the tackles in short yardage.

  • Pass protection is an unknown that teams will want answered. Nothing in the highlights film shows a pass pro rep. Given his frame, there's real concern he cannot hold up against NFL blitz packages. This could significantly limit his snaps in base downs until proven.

  • Scheme dependency. His best plays in highlights_2_ are all in space β€” designed runs to the perimeter, screens, open-field situations. There's limited evidence he can be an every-down back who grinds in a traditional run-first offense. If he lands in the wrong scheme, production will not follow.

  • ACC competition level question. The highlights look great, but FSU, UNC, Maryland, and Kentucky aren't the SEC or Big Ten. The test against Georgia (highlights_2_012) is a relevant data point, but it's a limited sample. Elite athleticism showed up on film, but there will be NFL evaluator skepticism about the level of competition he dominated.

  • No clear 3-down projection. Without pass pro validation and lacking the size to absorb heavy early-down rushing loads, the natural projection is "change-of-pace back" which limits dynasty upside β€” particularly in PPR formats where target share is crucial. The 2024 receiving numbers are encouraging but need to be replicated.

  • Career durability concern. The bio notes he "battled through a variety of injuries" in 2024 despite starting all 13 games. Smaller backs with previous injury history warrant monitoring.



  • NFL Comp


    Primary Comp: Raheem Mostert (SF/MIA)

    The profile is similar: undersized, speed-over-power, took years to find the right situation, then exploded in an outside-zone/space scheme. Mostert was a career practice squad player before the 49ers unlocked him β€” Haynes has a similar ceiling/floor split. In the right scheme (outside zone, spread-heavy), he's a game-breaker. In the wrong scheme, he's a roster bubble back. The key for dynasty owners: target him in the right landing spot.


    Secondary Comp: Clyde Edwards-Helaire (KC)

    The receiving ability and role in the passing game is the closest recent comp for Haynes' dual-threat potential. CEH was similarly discussed as a PPR weapon coming out. The difference is CEH had superior size and a premium landing spot. Haynes needs to thread both needles β€” find a team that designs the offense around his receiving and open-field traits. The upside is real; the team dependency is also real.




    Bottom Line


    Jamal Haynes is a legitimate speed-and-space weapon who belongs in an NFL backfield β€” the question is whose. The receiving production is real (28 catches in 2024), the open-field explosiveness is NFL-caliber (confirmed on film across multiple opponents), and the vision is good enough that he doesn't just run fast into traffic. The concerns β€” size, pass protection, scheme dependency β€” are legitimate and will push him down boards. For dynasty, the play is to target him in rounds 5–7 on draft day and monitor his landing situation closely. A scheme fit (spread, outside zone, pass-heavy) immediately makes him a relevant PPR asset; a bad fit (power run, physical AFC team) and he's a waiver wire afterthought.




    SCOUT SCORE

    Score: 62/100

    Projected Pick: R5, Pick 155–175



    Film Score: 62 / 100

    Scout 2Independent Analysis82 / 100

    Scout 2 Report: Jamal Haynes, RB, Georgia Tech


    The Short Version

    Haynes is the shiftiest back in the '26 classβ€”elite jukes and vision make him a nightmare in spaceβ€”but his diminutive frame caps power and long-term durability. Contrarian take: Not a lead back; gadget/3rd-down specialist with RB2 dynasty upside in PPR.


    Measurables & Background

    | Category | Details |

    |----------------|----------------------------------|

    | Height | 5'9\" |

    | Weight | 190 lbs |

    | Age | 23 (DOB: Oct 5, 2002) |

    | Class | Senior |

    | High School | Grayson HS (GA), 3-star recruit |

    | Background | Converted WR to RB; dynamic athlete from Georgia Tech offense |


    Film Sources

  • Analyzed only Sick EditzHD β€” Jamal Haynes πŸ”₯ Shiftiest RB in College Football α΄΄α΄° (highlights_2_001.jpg to highlights_2_018.jpg; 18 frames)
  • highlights_ and highlights_3_ were mislabeled (Haynes King QB footage; discarded)

  • Film Analysis

    Limited to 18-frame highlight reel, but reveals elite movement skills vs. ACC competition (e.g., FSU).


    Key RB Traits (graded 1-10):

  • Vision: 9/10 β€” Presses holes patiently, sets up blocks (highlights_2_011, highlights_2_013)
  • Burst/Acceleration: 9/10 β€” Explosive first step to daylight (highlights_2_003, highlights_2_006, highlights_2_017)
  • Agility/COD: 10/10 β€” Absurd lateral quickness, shifty jukes miss tackles (highlights_2_001, highlights_2_004, highlights_2_009, highlights_2_010, highlights_2_014)
  • Contact Balance: 7/10 β€” Good lean through arm tackles, but small frame spins him vs. bigger LB (highlights_2_002, highlights_2_007, highlights_2_012)
  • Speed: 8/10 β€” Functional long speed pulls away in space (highlights_2_005, highlights_2_015, highlights_2_018)
  • Power: 5/10 β€” Relies on angle/evasion over drive; stiff arms help but no bully ball (highlights_2_008)

  • Overall Grade: B (82/100) β€” Elite mover, average power/contact.


    Strengths

  • Elusive in open field: Makes LBs miss with hips/shoulders; shiftiest RB seen (highlights_2_001 stiff arm, highlights_2_004 cut, highlights_2_010 spin)
  • Quick burst/vision combo: Finds creases, explodes (highlights_2_003 gap press, highlights_2_011 hole hit, highlights_2_017 breakaway)
  • Ball security: Carries low/tight through traffic (highlights_2_008 secure)
  • Versatile athlete: Ex-WR traits shine in space (highlights_2_015 pull away, highlights_2_018 finish)

  • Concerns

  • Undersized (5'9/190) limits power vs. NFL fronts; gets stacked/spun by size (highlights_2_002, 007)
  • No pass pro or receiving shown; raw in those phases?
  • Durability risk for 200+ carry role; best as change-up back
  • Competition level: ACC solid, but highlights cherry-pick easy misses

  • Dynasty Outlook (1-3 Year Window)

    Year 1: RB3/ROT handcuff in committees. Year 2: RB2 in PPR if lands pass-happy OC. Year 3: Flex with spike weeks, but unlikely workhorse (200 touches max).


    NFL Comp

  • Floor: De'Von Achane β€” explosive scatback, injury-prone volume cap
  • Ceiling: Darren Sproles β€” eternal 3rd-down wizard, PPR machine

  • Bottom Line

    Day 3 steal for creative OC needing spark plug. Pass if you draft for bellcow RBsβ€”Haynes thrives in niche.


    SCOUT SCORE

    Score: 82/100

    Projected Pick: "R4, Pick 100-130"



    Film Score: 82 / 100

    College Stats

    2025–26 season

    124
    Carries
    531
    Rush Yards
    4.3
    YPC
    5
    Rush TDs
    33
    Receptions
    257
    Rec Yards
    0
    Rec TDs

    Measurables

    ● = confirmed at the Combine. Pre-combine estimates shown where unconfirmed.

    Height5'9"NOT CONFIRMED
    Weight190 lbsNOT CONFIRMED
    40-Yard Dashβ€”NOT CONFIRMED
    Vertical Jumpβ€”NOT CONFIRMED
    Broad Jumpβ€”NOT CONFIRMED
    Bench Pressβ€”NOT CONFIRMED
    3-Cone Drillβ€”NOT CONFIRMED
    Shuttle Runβ€”NOT CONFIRMED
    Arm Lengthβ€”NOT CONFIRMED
    Hand Sizeβ€”NOT CONFIRMED