Mark Gronowski

Mark Gronowski

QBΒ·Iowa
RS SeniorΒ·6'2"Β·230 lbs

Consensus

Derived from 2 independent scout reports + combine measurables.

66.0
Composite Score
Pick 120-262
Projected Pick
66.5
Film
+0.0
Combine
-0.5
Age

Scout Reports

Scout 1Primary Analysis51 / 100

DynastySignal Scouting Report

Mark Gronowski β€” QB | Iowa | Senior


Film Source: Hawkeye Breakdown β€” "Mark Gronowski Is Officially an Iowa Hawkeye. How Good Is He?" (55 frames)




The Short Version


Mark Gronowski is the winningest quarterback in NCAA history at any level β€” 58 career wins, three FCS national championships at South Dakota State β€” and he brings legitimate dual-threat chops, elite competitive experience, and outstanding football character. The case for him is simple: he wins everywhere he's been, he can hurt you with his legs, and his career 103:27 TD:INT ratio shows he takes care of the ball. The case against is equally simple: his arm is functional, not special; his Big Ten numbers in 2025 (10 TDs, 7 INTs, 1,741 yards in 13 starts) were modest by any standard; and FCS dominance doesn't guarantee NFL readiness. This is a system-dependent backup archetype who could stick on a roster if the situation is right, but there's no path to a franchise QB.




Measurables & Background


| Attribute | Value |

|-------------------|--------------------------------|

| Position | Quarterback |

| School | Iowa (transfer from SD State) |

| Class | Senior (2025 season) |

| Height | 6'2" |

| Weight | 233 lbs |

| Hand Size | 10ΒΌ" (Shrine Bowl) |

| Hometown | Naperville, IL |

| Transfer Date | January 7, 2025 (SDSU β†’ Iowa) |

| Career Starts | 68 |

| Career Wins | 58 (NCAA all-levels record) |

| Career Stats | 921/1,450, 12,049 yds, 103 TD / 27 INT; 515 rushes, 2,312 yds, 53 TD |

| 2025 Iowa Stats | 166/262, 1,741 yds, 10 TD / 7 INT; 130 rushes, 545 yds, 16 TD |

| All-Star Games | Shrine Bowl 2026 |




Film Sources Reviewed


| Source | Frames | Key Content |

|---------------------------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Hawkeye Breakdown β€” Mark Gronowski Is Officially an Iowa Hawkeye | 55 | SDSU career highlights (NDSU games at Fargodome, home games at Dykhouse Stadium, FCS Championship footage in Frisco TX); one FBS road game (Oklahoma State/Boone Pickens Stadium); pre-snap reads, throwing mechanics, scrambles, red zone sequences |




What The Film Shows


1. Arm Talent

Grade: 48/100 β€” Below Average for NFL Standards


Gronowski has a functional arm, not a franchise arm. The throwing mechanics captured in highlights_025 and highlights_042 show a relatively compact delivery with a high release point β€” good, not great. The release is a bit long in the wind-up, and the ball comes out with adequate velocity rather than elite zip. What you see is a QB who can fit the ball into tight windows on short-to-intermediate routes, but there's nothing on film that suggests he can threaten the deep third consistently against NFL-caliber defensive backs. In the Fargodome sequences (highlights_031, highlights_032, highlights_033), he shows the ability to deliver on the move, throwing across his body and throwing with good touch on intermediate routes. The concern is that the competition level at SDSU inflated some of these looks. In Iowa's Big Ten system (highlights_026 through highlights_036 at Oklahoma State), he looked more hesitant and the downfield opportunities were fewer β€” partly by design, partly by circumstance.


2. Accuracy & Touch

Grade: 53/100 β€” Average


The touch is real on short-to-intermediate throws. Multiple frames (highlights_025, highlights_041, highlights_042) show him delivering on rhythm throws with proper weight transfer and appropriate ball placement. He doesn't consistently put the ball in tight windows, but he's accurate on high-percentage throws β€” which is exactly what Iowa's offense asked of him. The 63.4% completion rate at Iowa (166/262) in a conservative offense is decent but not enough to project an above-average NFL passer. Pre-snap, you can see him going through reads (highlights_012, highlights_013, highlights_018, highlights_019, highlights_021, highlights_022) β€” the eyes are active and he's not locking onto receivers. But there isn't consistent evidence of anticipation throwing or placing the ball in difficult spots against tight coverage. He plays within himself, which is both a virtue and a ceiling.


3. Processing & Decision Making

Grade: 60/100 β€” Above Average for His Level


This is where Gronowski stands out. He is not a gunslinger β€” he is a game manager with good instincts and elite decisiveness. The 103:27 career TD:INT ratio tells you everything: he does not beat himself. Watch his pre-snap routine in highlights_018, highlights_020, highlights_021, highlights_022, highlights_026, highlights_027: active eyes, moving his head to survey the defense, appearing to make protection checks. He understands leverage and positioning. The downside is that his processing speed may not be elite at the NFL level, where defensive schemes are more complex and windows close faster than anything he faced at SDSU. His Iowa numbers suggest the upgrade in competition affected him β€” 7 INTs and limited downfield production is not the profile of a QB who consistently won the processing battle in the Big Ten. He played in a system that asked him to manage the game rather than win it, and he largely succeeded at that modest task.


4. Mobility & Athleticism

Grade: 63/100 β€” Legitimate Weapon


This is genuinely the most interesting part of his profile and the clearest path to NFL value. The film is loaded with evidence of real dual-threat ability. In highlights_015 and highlights_016, he shows plus acceleration through gaps and ability to turn the corner in space β€” not just scramble-for-the-sticks stuff, but legitimate run threat. His Iowa numbers (130 rushes, 545 yards, 16 rushing TDs) are remarkable: 16 rushing touchdowns from the QB spot in a conservative Kirk Ferentz offense is extraordinary. At NDSU (highlights_031, highlights_033), he shows the ability to escape pressure, get outside the pocket, and deliver accurate throws on the move. In highlights_008 and highlights_009, he's running with good pad level and vision β€” not a burner, but more athletic than his frame suggests. His career 515 rushes for 2,312 yards and 53 TDs underscore that this is a real, sustained dimension of his game, not just garbage-time scrambles. He slides and protects himself intelligently, which matters for longevity.


5. Pocket Presence & Toughness

Grade: 56/100 β€” Functional


He's not jumpy. The best example in the film is highlights_025 where he delivers a throw with a defender bearing down from his right β€” high release, stable base, gets the ball out. He doesn't panic under pressure, and multiple sequences at the Fargodome (highlights_031–033) against an NDSU program that generates legitimate pass rush talent show he can function in a compromised pocket. That said, he's not a statue who holds and fires into tight coverage β€” when the pocket collapses, he's more likely to take off and make yards with his legs than step up and deliver. That's fine for an NFL backup but limits the ceiling. His FCS Championship game experience (highlights_005, highlights_006) shows someone who doesn't wilt on a big stage β€” the Frisco Championship environment against top-tier FCS competition, and he thrived.


6. System Fit

Grade: 55/100 β€” Fit-Dependent


His profile screams West Coast or RPO-heavy system that can leverage his legs and keep him on high-percentage throws. He struggled to unlock Iowa's condensed, run-heavy pro-style offense β€” 1,741 yards in 13 Big Ten starts is not the output of a guy who can carry a team. The good news: any NFL team getting him gets someone with elite experience, leadership (Iowa's Hayden Fry Award, Big Ten Sportsmanship Award, Permanent Team Captain), and adaptability β€” he transferred from an FCS program to a Power Four program and never missed a start. The bad news: his ceiling in a pro-style system is limited, and in a pure West Coast vertical passing game, his arm may not have the velocity to threaten all levels consistently.




Strengths Summary


  • Elite career win rate and FCS championship pedigree (highlights_005, highlights_006): Three national titles and 58 career wins give him competitive experience that most Day 3 QBs simply don't have. He knows how to run an offense and he doesn't beat himself.
  • Legitimate dual-threat ability on tape (highlights_015, highlights_016, highlights_031): The rushing production at Iowa (16 TDs, 545 yards in a system that didn't feature the QB run) proves his athleticism isn't just FCS residue β€” it translated to the Big Ten.
  • Composure under pressure (highlights_025, highlights_009): Multiple instances of delivering throws with defenders in his face, high-release point mechanics holding up, no mechanical breakdown under duress.
  • Pre-snap intelligence (highlights_012, highlights_018, highlights_021, highlights_026, highlights_027): Active eyes, checking out of plays, reading defensive alignments β€” shows football IQ above the average late-round QB.
  • Outstanding size-athleticism combination at Shrine Bowl (6'2", 233, 10ΒΌ" hands): The frame is legitimately NFL-viable; he's not getting washed out for being undersized.
  • Protects the ball (career 103:27 TD:INT): Does not lose games with turnovers β€” a career INT rate under 2% across 1,450 attempts is genuinely impressive.



  • Concerns & Risks


  • FCS competition is the elephant in the room: The vast majority of his career tape and wins came against Missouri Valley Football Conference opponents. His Big Ten numbers were modest (63.4% completion, 10 TDs, 7 INTs, limited downfield production), and that matters.
  • Arm talent ceiling is mid: Nothing on film suggests he can threaten all three levels consistently in the NFL. There's adequate velocity for short-to-intermediate throws, but deep ball is limited based on what we see.
  • Age and redshirt history: As a senior/6th-year player, there's no development runway. What you see is what you get. The ceiling is fixed.
  • Iowa 2025 production suggests the Big Ten transition was difficult: 1,741 passing yards in 13 starts (134 YPG) is not a QB carrying his team. The offense relied heavily on his legs (16 rush TDs) to make plays, which will be harder to replicate at the next level.
  • System dependence: His best football was in a pro-style spread at SDSU that maximized his strengths. Iowa's traditional system exposed the limitations of his passing arm.
  • No evidence of advanced route recognition at NFL speed: Pre-snap reads look fine, but processing under fire against Big Ten defensive looks was inconsistent.



  • NFL Comp


    Primary Comp: Taylor Heinicke (Early Career)

    Like Heinicke coming out of Old Dominion, Gronowski is a compact dual-threat QB with good football instincts, above-average mobility, legitimate toughness, and enough arm to play. He's not a starter, but in the right system β€” especially one with RPO elements or a coaches staff that will scheme him moving opportunities β€” he can carve out a backup career. Heinicke eventually got NFL starting opportunities; Gronowski has a plausible path to the same if he lands in the right situation and develops his downfield passing game.


    Secondary Comp: Bailey Zappe (2022 Draft)

    Zappe was a productive college QB whose production didn't fully translate aesthetically to the NFL β€” he's a game-manager type with decent arm talent who survives on accuracy, anticipation, and football IQ. Gronowski has more athleticism than Zappe but comparable arm ceiling and similar "fits-in-the-right-system" limitations. Day 3 pick, backup trajectory, spot starter upside if things break right.




    Bottom Line


    Mark Gronowski is the most decorated winner in college football history at any level, and that's not nothing β€” but the NFL drafts ability, not rΓ©sumΓ©s, and his 2025 Big Ten season left too many questions about whether his game translates to the professional level. The rushing dimension is real and will absolutely earn him a roster spot somewhere, and his ball-security instincts and leadership profile make him easy to love as a backup. Dynasty owners should watch his NFL situation closely: land in an RPO-friendly system with a veteran starter ahead of him and he could develop into a valuable streaming/handcuff option if that starter goes down. Don't pay starter price for him in any dynasty format β€” he's a developmental stash with a clear ceiling as a backup.




    SCOUT SCORE

    Score: 51/100

    Projected Pick: R5-R6, Pick 150-220



    Film Score: 51 / 100

    Scout 2Independent Analysis82 / 100

    Scout 2 Report: Mark Gronowski, QB, Iowa


    The Short Version

    Gronowski is a battle-tested FCS stud with sneaky athleticism and poise beyond his level, but his arm talent caps him as a high-end backup, not the franchise savior Iowa fans dream of. Contrarian take: The transfer hype inflates him to Day 2; he's a Day 3 gem for teams needing grit over glamour.


    Measurables & Background

    | Trait | Detail |

    |-------|--------|

    | Height | 6'2\" |

    | Weight | 225 lbs |

    | Age | 24 (DOB ~2002) |

    | Class | Sr (trans. SDSU -> Iowa 2025) |

    | Stats (SDSU career) | 70% comp, 10k+ yds, 90+ TD, 20 INT, 30 rush TD |

    | Accolades | 2x FCS Champ, Walter Payton finalist |


    Film Sources

    | Source | Frames | Notes |

    |--------|--------|-------|

    | Hawkeye Breakdown (10:12) | 55 | SDSU highlights; transfer preview |


    Film Analysis

    Arm Talent: 6/10 - Functional velocity on short/intermediate, but deep balls lack zip and arc poorly (highlights_015, 023, 039). Sidearm flashes but inconsistent.


    Accuracy/Placement: 8/10 - Laser precise in rhythm, windows tight (highlights_005, 012, 027).


    Mobility/Athleticism: 9/10 - Elusive scrambler, TD threat (highlights_028, 041, 052).


    Pocket Presence: 7/10 - Steps up vs pressure, feels rush (highlights_033, 046).


    Decision Making/Processing: 7/10 - Quick to right read, smart checkdowns (highlights_007, 019, 035).


    Poise/Leadership: 8/10 - Cool under fire, winner vibe (multiple pre-snap huddles 001-004, endzone celebrations 054-055).


    Overall Grade: B


    Strengths

  • Elite toughness/runner (highlights_028: weaves defenders for TD; 041: extends play).
  • Touch/anticipation on underneath throws (highlights_012: back-shoulder dime).
  • Quick release, no wasted motion (highlights_005 dropback).
  • Play extender, rarely sacked (highlights_033 pocket slide).

  • Concerns

  • Marginal arm strength for NFL deep shots; balls hang (highlights_023, 039).
  • Undersized frame, durability vs NFL rush?
  • FCS competition jump to Big Ten/Iowa may expose processing limits.
  • Older prospect, limited upside window.

  • Dynasty Outlook

    1-yr: Practice squad/spot starter in run-first offense (e.g., Steelers type).

    2-3 yr: RB3/spot QB2 with 10-15 starts potential if develops arm.


    NFL Comp

  • Floor: Sean Clifford ( Packers backup, gamer).
  • Ceiling: Geno Smith (late bloomer, mobile manager).

  • Bottom Line

    Day 3 priority with backup reliability; pass if chasing starsβ€”grab for depth.


    SCOUT SCORE

    Score: 82/100

    Projected Pick: "R3, Pick 80-100"


    Film Score: 82 / 100

    College Stats

    2025–26 season

    1741
    Pass Yards
    10
    Pass TDs
    7
    INTs
    63.4%
    Comp %
    6.6
    YPA
    545
    Rush Yards
    16
    Rush TDs

    Measurables

    ● = confirmed at the Combine. Pre-combine estimates shown where unconfirmed.

    Height6'2"NOT CONFIRMED
    Weight230 lbsNOT CONFIRMED
    40-Yard Dashβ€”NOT CONFIRMED
    Vertical Jumpβ€”NOT CONFIRMED
    Broad Jumpβ€”NOT CONFIRMED
    Bench Pressβ€”NOT CONFIRMED
    3-Cone Drillβ€”NOT CONFIRMED
    Shuttle Runβ€”NOT CONFIRMED
    Arm Lengthβ€”NOT CONFIRMED
    Hand Sizeβ€”NOT CONFIRMED