Derived from 2 independent scout reports + combine measurables.
DynastySignal | Film-Based Evaluation
Dillon Thieneman is a versatile, instinct-driven safety who plays with rare cerebral polish for his age — he was wrecking Big Ten offenses as a true freshman and is now a First-Team All-American coming out of a top-ten Oregon program. The case for him is hard to argue against: elite interception production (8 career picks), legitimate sideline-to-sideline range, fearless downhill tackling, and the kind of pre-snap processing that most safeties spend years developing. The case against is mostly about fit and floor risk — he's not a pure man-coverage eraser off the boundary, his physical tools are good but not elite (6'0", ~205 lbs, ~4.44 speed), and the question of whether he can be a true single-high centerfielder or is better as a versatile two-high piece will drive his NFL landing spot and early role.
| Attribute | Detail |
|---|---|
| Name | Dillon Thieneman |
| Position | Safety (FS/SS hybrid) |
| School | Oregon (via Purdue) |
| Class | 2026 |
| Hometown | Westfield, Indiana |
| Height | ~6'0" |
| Weight | ~205 lbs |
| Est. 40 | ~4.44 (projected) |
| Jersey # | #31 (Purdue), Oregon |
| 2023 Stats | 6 INTs, 74 solo tackles, Big Ten Freshman of the Year |
| 2025 Stats | 96 tackles, 2 INT, 3.5 TFL, 1 sack, 5 PD (First-Team All-American, First-Team All-Big Ten) |
| Career INTs | 8 across three seasons |
| Experience | Three college seasons; started immediately as a true freshman |
| Transfer | Purdue → Oregon (2025) |
| Safety Rank | #3 in 2026 class (behind Caleb Downs, Kyle Louis) |
| Source | Frames | Key Content |
|---|---|---|
| The Jets Film Room – Luke | 18 (film_001–film_018) | Detailed coverage technique breakdown; pre-snap alignment and post-snap reads; zone shell analysis across Big Ten games vs. Penn State, Indiana, Purdue home games |
| Big Ten Football / B1G Network | 18 (official_001–official_018) | Official highlight reel; game-action vs. Fresno State, Iowa, Nebraska, Indiana, Northwestern, Illinois, Michigan State; interception celebration/return, diving sideline tackle, run-stop pile work |
| Locked On NFL Draft | 19 (highlights_001–highlights_019) | Summer scouting Downs vs. Thieneman comparison; scout analysis context; player photos showing Thieneman (#31) in Purdue white making tackle vs. Michigan State ball carrier; Michael Taaffe physical comparison |
Thieneman is almost exclusively used in two-high safety shells throughout the film_001–film_018 sequence. He's aligned at 12–15 yards pre-snap in Cover 2 and Cover 4/Quarters looks, maintaining disciplined depth and never biting early on play-action. In film_005 and film_007, he's clearly the circled player and shows a clean backpedal-to-break transition — his hips flip smoothly and he doesn't false step when triggering. What you don't see a lot of is one-on-one press man or slot coverage responsibility, which is the honest limitation of the film set. His most natural home is reading QB eyes from depth and driving on intermediate routes — he's at his best as a zone processor, not a trail man-cover defender.
This is his calling card and the film backs it up. Eight career interceptions isn't a fluke — it's pattern recognition executing at a repeatable level. official_012 shows Thieneman in full stride carrying the football on what appears to be an interception return vs. Indiana, with his stride mechanics, forward lean, and ball security all elite. His separation from the closest Indiana pursuer in that frame is stark — he's not laboring; he's in control. In film_015, the contested play near the Penn State end zone area appears to show him arriving at the catch point with proper leverage to contest or intercept. His instincts on route recognition are the driver here — he reads QB shoulders early enough that he doesn't have to rely on raw speed to close on the ball.
This is where Thieneman separates himself from the typical "coverage safety" archetype. He is an active, willing, physical downhill defender. The film sequence from film_013–film_014 at Penn State shows him closing from depth (12+ yards back) to the line of scrimmage on a run play — the distance he covers is legitimately impressive. In official_002, the diving sideline tackle vs. Fresno State is the defining clip: full-extension launch, body wrapping the ball carrier at the boundary, complete follow-through. That's not just effort — that's athleticism and pursuit angle combined. official_003 and official_008 show him in the scrum against Iowa and Nebraska, where he's engaging with linemen who have 50+ pounds on him and not getting washed. official_011 against Indiana shows proper alley-filling technique — he's not just arriving late, he's taking the right angle to cut off the play.
The film doesn't lie about his movement skills — he's smooth, not explosive. His closing burst is real (the Fresno State tackle in official_002 shows legitimate range), and his recovery speed when he does break late appears to be adequate but not elite. The official_012 interception return stride shows clean sprint mechanics and legitimate open-field speed. He's not going to wow anyone at the combine with record numbers, but the ~4.44 estimate fits what the film shows — quick-twitch enough for a safety, not a track guy. His change-of-direction appears more fluid than sudden, which is a coverage safety trait. He won't get beaten by most receivers on vertical routes, but there will be games against elite speed where teams try to stress him.
The film essentially shows one thing: Thieneman in zone. Every pre-snap look in the film_ sequence is a two-high shell. He processes zone responsibilities at an NFL-ready level — reading QB eyes, maintaining coverage landmarks, triggering on the break. What concerns me is the absence of press-man reps. The available film doesn't give us a meaningful sample of him matched up one-on-one at the line against receivers or tight ends, which means NFL teams will have to take some of that on faith or address it in pre-draft workouts. His performance in the nickel role (which he logged 700+ snaps in per NFLDraftBuzz) suggests he can hold up in short-area man, but it's not a proven strength from this film set.
Primary: Micah Hyde (early career) — Hyde was a versatile, instinct-driven safety who processed zone assignments quickly, manufactured turnovers at a high rate, and was more valuable as a two-high piece than a pure single-high deep safety. Hyde wasn't a blazer but made plays everywhere on the field because of processing speed and angles. Thieneman operates similarly — the ball-hawking production, zone IQ, run support willingness, and positional versatility map cleanly. Hyde became a top-10 safety in the NFL because coordinators could deploy him at every spot in the secondary. Thieneman has that same developmental ceiling if the man coverage side of his game develops.
Secondary: Kyle Hamilton (early safety comp, lower ceiling version) — Hamilton's draft profile emphasized similar traits: elite interception production, zone domination, physical run support, and the question of whether he was truly a deep safety or a hybrid rover. Thieneman is a version of that profile without Hamilton's elite size and tackle radius. The floor/ceiling range is narrower, but the archetype and the conversation NFL teams will have about his best deployment is the same.
Dillon Thieneman is the best player in the 2026 draft class that most casual fans haven't fully evaluated yet. He was a transcendent freshman who kept producing on a transfer at Oregon against the best competition — that kind of consistent performance across contexts is exactly what separates real prospects from compile stats. The dynasty angle is real: he's the type of safety who generates turnovers at every level of his career, and turnovers drive fantasy-adjacent defensive value and team wins alike. The ceiling is a Pro Bowl-caliber two-high safety in a zone-heavy system; the floor is a rotational box/rover defender who never locks down the free safety position because teams don't trust him single-high. Pick the right team deployment when he lands and the dynasty value follows.
Score: 82/100
Projected Pick: R1, Pick 28-40 (late first / early second)
Film Score: 82 / 100
Thieneman's a ball-hawking blitzer with nasty run fits, but hype as SAF1 is smoke—tight hips and average man coverage cap him at high-end starter, not All-Pro. Overdraft risk if boards chase flash.
| Attribute | Detail |
|---------------|-------------------------|
| Height | 6'1\" |
| Weight | 210 lbs |
| Age (Draft) | 21 |
| School | Oregon (trans. Purdue) |
| Class | Jr. |
| 40 Time | 4.55 (est.) |
| Production | 4 INT, 65 tackles (Purdue '24) |
| Source | Description | Frames |
|--------|-------------|--------|
| Jets Film Room | Breakdown: Top 50? (9:36) | film_001 - film_018 |
| Big Ten Highlights | Official DB highlights (7:16) | official_001 - official_018 |
| Locked On NFL | Downs/Thieneman SAF1 battle (29:59) | highlights_001 - highlights_019 |
Key Safety Traits (graded X/10 + letter):
Overall Grade: B+
Tight hips limit man/match vs shifty WRs—gets turned around (highlights_009 slot fade beaten; film_011 break not matched). Average length arm tackles miss in space (official_017 whiff open field). Production inflated vs weak Big Ten air raids; Oregon tape needed to confirm vs Power 5 passing.
Day 2 steal (R2-3), rotates Year 1 in multi-safety looks, FS starter by Y2 for zone-heavy DCs (e.g., Fangio tree). Dynasty RB3 value peaks Y3 if scheme fits—trade-up target post-Junior year.
Thieneman's no SAF1 crown-wearer vs elite athletes—smart, tough Day 2 gem for run-first teams, but fade top-50 hype.
Score: 87/100
Projected Pick: R2, Pick 40-55
Film Score: 87 / 100
2025–26 season
College stats are not tracked for S prospects.
● = confirmed at the Combine. Pre-combine estimates shown where unconfirmed.