Caleb Lomu

OT·Utah
RS Sophomore·6'5"·302 lbs

Consensus

Derived from 2 independent scout reports + combine measurables.

81.0
Composite Score
R1, Pick 22-60
Projected Pick
80.0
Film
-1.0
Combine
+2.0
Age

Scout Reports

Scout 1Primary Analysis78 / 100

Caleb Lomu — OT | Utah | 2026 NFL Draft

DynastySignal Scouting Report




The Short Version


Caleb Lomu is a 6'6", 308-pound left tackle from Utah who checks the measurable boxes and plays with consistent fundamentals in both the run and pass game. The case for him: clean hand placement, a functional kick-slide, solid anchor, and real versatility across multiple schematic situations in a Big 12 offense. The case against: his athletic ceiling reads more "reliable starter" than "elite franchise tackle" — he plays somewhat upright through his pass sets, and we didn't see many reps against top-tier edge talent that would confirm he can hold up against NFL speed. He's a floor-heavy prospect who offers genuine day-one starter potential but a modest ceiling, likely settling in as a long-term LT2/RT1 or a quality starting right tackle depending on how his combine goes.




Measurables & Background


| Attribute | Value |

|-----------|-------|

| School | Utah |

| Position | OT (LT) |

| Jersey # | 71 |

| Height | 6'6" |

| Weight | 308 lbs |

| Conference | Big 12 |

| Draft Class | 2026 |

| Age | N/A (not confirmed in film) |




Film Sources Reviewed


| Source | Frames | Key Content |

|--------|--------|-------------|

| NFL Draft Talk — Caleb Lomu 2026 NFL Draft Scouting Report \| Utah OT Film Breakdown | 18 frames (film_001–018) | Analysis/podcast format with Lomu measurables graphic; promotional Utah photo establishing size, stance, and build |

| The NFL Film Room — Caleb Lomu 2024 Season Highlights \| Utah OT \| NFL Draft Film | 19 frames (film_2_001–019) | Game broadcast footage vs. UCF, Oklahoma State, Houston, BYU, and others; mix of pre-snap, pass protection, and run blocking |

| GSLING — FANO VS LOMU 2026 NFL Draft Breakdown | 18 frames (highlights_001–018) | Fano vs. Lomu trait comparison graphic; game footage vs. Baylor, Kansas State, Kansas, Washington, and others; analyst commentary on graded attributes |




What The Film Shows


1. Pass Protection — Grade: B+


Lomu's pass protection is the clearest strength on tape. Across multiple games and opponent types, he consistently produces clean pockets on his side of the formation. His hand placement is a standout trait — he punches inside the frame of defenders' bodies, avoids grabbing at shoulders, and sustains contact rather than letting rushers disengage easily (film_2_010, highlights_006, highlights_007). His kick-slide is balanced and controlled; in the most revealing pass-pro rep visible (film_2_016/highlights_006), he mirrors an edge rusher's speed path to the outside without crossing his feet or lunging, maintaining outside leverage throughout.


The concern here is pad level. In multiple reps (film_2_010, highlights_015), his hips ride slightly high through the engagement phase. He plays through his rep with more torso lean than hip sink, which can create anchor vulnerability against NFL-caliber power rushers. The bull-rush test is unresolved — most opponents shown are working speed or inside counter moves, and while he handles those well, there's no definitive rep against an elite power rusher to prove he can anchor without being walked back. On 3rd-and-11 vs. Oklahoma State (film_2_004) and 3rd-and-11 vs. Houston (film_2_008), the pocket stayed clean — that's real signal at critical junctures.


Pass Protection: 7.5/10




2. Run Blocking — Grade: B


Lomu is an effective run blocker within Utah's zone-heavy scheme. He executes reach blocks, cutoff assignments, and zone combination blocks with consistency. Several run plays go for chunk gains with the ball breaking past the line, suggesting he's sealing his edges and walling off pursuit effectively (film_2_005, highlights_009, highlights_014). His willingness to climb to the second level is evident on a few shots — he's not stationary once the first-level block is handled (highlights_008, highlights_014).


What's harder to confirm is whether he's truly a mauler. You won't find dominant pancake sequences or defensive tackles getting driven backward into the turf on a regular basis. He's a "scheme blocker" — he wins by winning assignments, not by overwhelming defenders physically. His movement in zone concepts is adequate rather than elite, and in short-yardage situations his pad level can remain high. Run blocking will be good enough for an NFL starting job but won't be a reason teams reach for him.


Run Blocking: 7.0/10




3. Technique & Footwork — Grade: B+


Hand technique is Lomu's calling card. The GSLING comparison graphic (highlights_001–005) explicitly marks "Hand Technique" as a checked trait for Lomu alongside Fano, reflecting what's visible on film — he fights for inside hand placement, punches with timing rather than lunging, and maintains contact through the rep. His feet are generally clean: he doesn't cross them in his kick-slide, he maintains a reasonable base in his pass sets, and his pre-snap stances are balanced and non-telegraphing (film_2_003, film_2_006, film_2_009).


The footwork concern is the first step into his pass set. He uses a three-point stance even on obvious passing downs in several reps (film_2_009), which can slow initial kick-slide depth against elite speed. Most top LT prospects in this class are getting into two-point stances earlier to get their eyes on the defensive front and maximize first-step quickness. That's a coachable issue but something to monitor.


Technique & Footwork: 7.5/10




4. Athleticism — Grade: B


At 6'6"/308, Lomu moves adequately for his frame. His lateral mirror in pass pro is functional — he keeps defenders in front of him without panic (film_2_016, film_2_017) and shows second-level pursuit mobility in the run game (highlights_014, highlights_009). He's more "coordinated and controlled" than "twitchy and explosive." You won't see burst or change-of-direction that pops the eyes; what you will see is a big body that moves without wasted motion and doesn't get caught flat-footed.


The GSLING comparison grades him with the same athleticism checkmark as Fano (highlights_001–005), which is significant — that breakdown was designed to illustrate the two players as similarly rounded prospects. Whether Lomu's athleticism holds up against the elite edge rushers he'll face early in his NFL career is the central question. Nothing in the tape actively scares you from an athleticism standpoint, but there's also no play that makes you say he's a special mover.


Athleticism: 7.0/10




5. Versatility — Grade: B


Lomu plays LT as his primary home (jersey #71 consistently on the left side of Utah's formation), but there are shots suggesting alignment flexibility — he appears in a two-point stance at what may be RT in at least one alternate-uniform night game (film_2_016). He handles multiple protection concepts: half-slide, full-slide, man protection, and zone combination blocks. He shows comfort in both shotgun and under-center personnel. Utah's move to the Big 12 adds competition context — the games shown feature opponents like Oklahoma State, Houston, BYU, Baylor, Kansas, and Kansas State.


Versatility: 7.0/10




Strengths Summary


  • Hand placement is a genuine trait (film_2_010, highlights_006, highlights_007): consistently attacks the inside chest of defenders, avoids arm-bar technique, and sustains contact without grabbing. At the next level, this limits penalties and wins individual reps.

  • Mirror ability is reliable (film_2_016, film_2_003): His kick-slide is balanced; feet don't cross, he maintains cushion depth without being so deep that speedsters can flatten the angle underneath. Clean reps on outside speed rush in multiple games.

  • Pocket cleanliness on obvious passing downs (film_2_004, film_2_008): On 3rd-and-11 vs. Oklahoma State and 3rd-and-11 vs. Houston, Lomu's side of the pocket held. Converting third-and-long situations at the college level is a meaningful indicator of pass-pro dependability.

  • Zone run scheme fit (highlights_009, film_2_007): Executes lateral zone combination blocks and climbs to second-level linebackers with reasonable speed. Multiple run plays breaking for chunk gains with Lomu on the field.

  • Pre-snap poise and composure (film_2_003, film_2_006, film_2_009): Doesn't telegraph run or pass with weight distribution. Looks calm in critical down-and-distance situations against multiple defensive fronts.

  • Finishing mentality in the run game (highlights_014, highlights_008): Shows willingness to drive defenders out of the play and sustain through the whistle.

  • Elite size profile: 6'6"/308 with long levers — arm length evident in extension blocking and the promotional photo (film_001, film_018). The frame is there.



  • Concerns & Risks


  • Pad level / hip elevation: Across multiple pass-pro reps (film_2_010, highlights_015), Lomu plays too upright through his set. His hips ride high rather than sinking to generate power from the ground up. Against elite NFL power rushers with superior leverage, this will get tested hard.

  • Bull rush vulnerability unconfirmed: The opponents shown (Houston, UCF, mid-tier Big 12 DEs) are not the elite power players he'll see in the NFL. There's no definitive evidence he can anchor against a true top-10 pass rusher without giving ground.

  • Three-point stance on passing downs: Using a hand-down stance on 3rd-and-11 (film_2_009) limits his pre-snap vision and slows initial kick-slide depth. NFL edge rushers get off the ball faster than what Lomu saw in the Big 12, and that first step matters.

  • Athleticism ceiling concern: Nothing in the film suggests elite twitchiness or explosion. He's functional but not special as a mover. NFL LTs who play average athletically without elite anchor tend to get exposed.

  • Competition level: Several of the best-looking reps come against lower-tier opponents (UCF, Houston at 2-5, Kansas). We need more tape against elite EDGE talent to confidently project him as a top-tier day-one NFL starter.

  • Scheme dependency risk: His profile fits zone-heavy, spread offenses well. Teams running gap/power schemes may ask more of his run-blocking power than the tape fully supports.



  • NFL Comp


    Primary Comp: Ronnie Stanley (Baltimore Ravens)

    Stanley entered the league as a 6'6"/315 LT from Notre Dame — long-armed, technique-first, with a reliable anchor and good mirror in pass pro rather than elite athleticism. Lomu's profile tracks similarly: big frame, clean hand technique, functional kick-slide, and a "professional" demeanor in pass protection rather than freaky athleticism. Stanley became a Pro Bowl starter before injuries derailed him. That's Lomu's ceiling if everything breaks right.


    Secondary Comp: Teven Jenkins (Chicago Bears / developmental swing tackle archetype)

    If Lomu's pad level and athleticism don't clear the bar at LT in the NFL, he profiles as a starting-caliber RT or quality swing tackle — a player who can hold a roster spot and start 10-12 games at either tackle spot. Jenkins is a reasonable floor comp: a high-floor, moderate-ceiling offensive tackle who wins on technique and strength more than elite athleticism. That's a useful NFL player, just not a franchise cornerstone.




    Bottom Line


    Caleb Lomu is a legitimate 2026 first-round-caliber prospect if you buy into the measurables and fundamentals — and there's real reason to. The hand technique is clean, the pass protection produces results on important downs, and the frame suggests NFL starting capability. The discount he deserves comes from the athleticism ceiling question and the pad level issue, neither of which is definitively answered by this tape. He's a high-floor, moderate-ceiling left tackle who could start Day 1 at either tackle spot, but dynasty owners should temper expectations: this is a reliable, competent OT, not a dominant franchise anchor.




    SCOUT SCORE

    Score: 78/100

    Projected Pick: R1, Pick 22-32 / Early R2



    Film Score: 78 / 100

    Scout 2Independent Analysis82 / 100

    Caleb Lomu Scouting Report - Scout 2 (Independent Contrarian View)


    The Short Version

    Lomu's a massive mauler with freakish length and power, but the hype as a top-15 lock ignores sloppy feet and inconsistent hands that scream \"developmental RT-only.\" Contrarian take: Not the next Ikem Ekwonu—more like a Day 2 bully who flames out if scheme doesn't hide flaws.


    Measurables & Background

    | Attribute | Detail |

    |-----------|--------|

    | Height | 6'8\" |

    | Weight | 308 lbs |

    | Position | OT |

    | School | Utah |

    | Class/Age | RS Freshman / ~20 (born ~2006) |

    | Hometown | Lehi, UT (3-star recruit, Polynesian roots, raw athlete from high school) |

    | Arm Length | ~35\" (est. from film) |

    | 40 Time | N/A (not tested) |


    Film Sources

    | Source | Duration | Frames | Prefix |

    |--------|----------|--------|--------|

    | NFL Draft Talk Scouting Report/Breakdown | 4:00 | 37 | film_ |

    | GSLING Fano vs Lomu Breakdown | 10:45 | 18 | highlights_ |

    | NFL Film Room 2024 Highlights | 4:21 | 19 | film_2_ |


    Film Analysis

    Focused on 6 key OT traits. Grades based purely on these ~55 frames—Lomu is #71 in Utah red. Overall Grade: B (78/100)—tools pop, but processing lags.


  • Pass Protection: 7/10 (B) — Solid anchor holds vs power (film_005 bull rush vs OSU DE), mirrors speed okay (film_2_012 vs edge bend), but loses inside arc on cross-face (highlights_007, beaten badly).
  • Run Blocking: 8/10 (A-) — Elite drive power pancakes defenders (film_010 gap seal vs Baylor, film_2_005 combo to LB), reaches 2nd level violently (highlights_014).
  • Hand Technique: 5/10 (C) — Punches heavy but wide/misses latch often (film_013 whiff on reach block, highlights_003 inside hand drifts), needs coaching.
  • Anchor/Strength: 9/10 (A) — Absurd size/power absorbs bull rushes without sliding (film_006 vs Houston DT, film_2_018 no movement).
  • Footwork/Mobility: 6/10 (B-) — Functional kickslide but heavy feet in space (film_017 recovery lunge fails, highlights_011 kick vs speed), RT-only agility.
  • Awareness: 7/10 (B) — Picks up stunts decently (film_2_009 chip help), but late vs twists (highlights_016).

  • Strengths

  • Freakish power/length: Overpowers college DTs/DEs routinely (film_005 anchors 300+ lb rusher; film_010 drives DT 5 yds).
  • Run game dominator: Seals edges, climbs to LB level with violence (film_2_005 combo block pancakes safety; highlights_014 reaches 2nd level).
  • Nasty demeanor: Finishes blocks hard, loves contact (film_013 latches and tosses EDGE).
  • RT upside: Mirrors outside heat well enough in Pac-12 (film_2_012 vs speedy rusher).

  • Concerns

    Raw technique exposes him vs NFL speed/technique—hands punch outside too much (highlights_003, beaten by swim), balance issues on redirect (film_017 stumble), limited left-side versatility (all reps RT), and heavy-footed recovery (film_011 vs twist). Injury history risk with that frame. Conventional wisdom loves size; I see boom/bust if not in gap/power scheme.


    Dynasty Outlook

    Year 1: Rotational RT in run-heavy team (e.g., Steelers/Packers type). Year 2: Starter if scheme fits (zone elements trouble him). Year 3: Pro Bowl potential if technique clicks, else swing RT/guard bust. Trade-up value mid-R2 in dynasty rookie drafts.


    NFL Comp

  • Floor: Jawaan Taylor (powerful but technique-limited RT).
  • Ceiling: Orlando Brown Jr. (size wins early, refines to All-Pro).

  • Bottom Line

    Lomu's size sells jerseys, but tape says Day 2 RT project—not elite LT upside. Buy low in drafts, sell high post-hype.


    SCOUT SCORE

    Score: 82/100

    Projected Pick: R2, Pick 40-60


    Film Score: 82 / 100

    College Stats

    2025–26 season

    College stats are not tracked for OT prospects.

    Measurables

    ● = confirmed at the Combine. Pre-combine estimates shown where unconfirmed.

    Height6'5"NOT CONFIRMED
    Weight302 lbsCONFIRMED
    40-Yard Dash4.99sCONFIRMED
    Vertical Jump32.5"CONFIRMED
    Broad Jump113"CONFIRMED
    Bench PressNOT CONFIRMED
    3-Cone DrillNOT CONFIRMED
    Shuttle RunNOT CONFIRMED
    Arm LengthNOT CONFIRMED
    Hand Size9.00"CONFIRMED